More Cars!

Außer Dingel und Meyer gibt es offenbar noch zahlreiche weitere Erfinder, die effiziente Wasserstoff-Generatoren mit detaillierten Bauanleitungen (!) zum Laufen gebracht haben:

Spirit of Maat Selbstbauanleitung
wird u.a. im
Wasserauto-Forum diskutiert.

H2O Fuel


Unter: http://www.rsc.org/is/journals/current/chemcomm/contents/clic/illcontlist/1996/cccc9614.htm Punkt 1613 findet man ergänzend eine Formel von Antonio Cervilla und Elisa Llopis.Ob die Formel zu der Geschichte mit dem Wasserkatalysator auf Molybdenumbasis aus Valencia paßt, weis ich nicht. Ein anderes Patent von dieser Gruppe: WO9101988



Carl Cella's Water Car:





Dr. Andrija Puharich erhielt 1983 das U.S. Patent 4,394,230 für “Method and Apparatus for Splitting Water Molecules”


Ein weiterer Wasser-Elektrolyse-Erfinder war Francisco Pacheco aus New Jersey. Er erfand den “Pacheco Bi-Polar Autoelectric Hydrogen Generator” (U.S. Patent No. 5,089,107), mit dem Wasserstoff nach Bedarf aus Meerwasser gewonnen werden kann.


Benjamin Hofer (Schweiz): Erfolgreiche Wasserspaltung mittels Niedertemperatur (keine Elektrolyse).

Kommentar von R. Stoll: “Es ist eine völlig unbrauchbare Konstruktion - ohne jegliche Zukunft. Von einer erfolgreichen Wasserspaltung kann nicht die Rede sein. Die energiemässige Wirtschaftlichkeit läge unter 2 %!”


Ein revolutionär neues Wasser-Spaltungsverfahren, das mit Hilfe eines simplen, um ein 5mm Rohr gewickelten Orgon-Akkumulators (metallische und organische Schichten) und einem “Resonator” (Flachspule aus besonders resonanzfähigem Material, evtl. Titanium?) Freie Energie so “auf den Punkt” konzentriert, daß enorme Mengen Knallgas erzeugt werden, wenn man Wasser hindurchleitet.

Verbesserte Wasser-Elektrolyse Zelle nach Archie Blue, Patentschrift US4124463.

Ich habe heute erst einmal eine Elektrolyse-Zelle nach dem US-Patent von Archi Blue in mein Auto eingebaut. Es ist eine Veränderung im Lauf des Motors aufgetreten, und die Leelaufdrehzahl ist gesunken. Morgen werde ich mal sehen ob der Motor wirklich nach längerer Betriebszeit ohne Benzin läuft.... W.C.


 Rudolf Gunnerman

“Sauberer” Treibstoff:

20% Wasser + 5% Emulgator + 80% Schweröl
statt 20% Diesel + 80% Schweröl)


 Detroit News, 11. Februar 1996


Wie man sieht: Solange die Ölkonzerne noch mitverdienen (Gunnerman bewegt sich mit seinen 20% Wasser wohl an der “Obergrenze” des gerade noch Erlaubten), werden alternative Technologien zugelassen und erhalten sogar Auszeichnungen! ;-)

Bild klicken für Artikel


Von Adolf Schneider, INET

Hallo, Water Cracking Researchers

According to Andreas Hecht from bos-list@sax.de you should have a look to "Experiment zur Hochfrequenz-Analyse von Wasser"

There you will find informations on a practical experiment concerning "high-frequency-analysis of water" (not so high, only some 900 Hz).

Concerning the calculations at the end of this article "Experiment ..." there are some doubts from my part. According to the annex in this email you will get an energy density of the hydrogen produced from 1 litre water which equals 1/30 of the energy density of gasoline (not 0.7). So after the 360 minutes running of the system you will get - with a production rate of 1 litre H2O splitting per minute - a total of 360 litre splitted H2O which equals 360/30 = 12 litre gasoline. Compared with a standard car which consumes 10 litre/100 km you could bridge a distance of 120 km (not the 2'500 km mentioned in the article) with 300 litre water. If you compare the total energy of 12 litre gasoline - which is 528 megajoule or 146 kWh - with the expended electrical energy of 4.8 V * 5 Ah= 24 Wh - you have an unexpected high O/U ratio. This seems to be a mystery.

Anyway - the O/U-effect of water splitting is not so a strange phenomenon if you are aware that even in standard DC current electrolysis there exist a small window to get more energy out compared to the "invested" electrical energy if you choose the right parameters to stimulate such an "endogenous" process - that means a water splitting process with additonal energy flowing in from the ambient temperature field. Stefan Hartman mentioned the following literature where you can find the "right" parameters for such a process:

From "FUEL FROM WATER, Energy Independence with Hydrogen" Author Michael A.Peavey Publisher Merit, Inc., P.O. Box 694 Louisville,
KY 40205 Library of Congress Number 88-188956 ISBN 0-945516-04-5, page 22: " The smallest amount of energy needed to electrolyse one mole of water is 65.3 Wh at 25 degrees Celcius (77 degress F). When the Hydrogen and Oxygen are recombined into water during combustion 79.3 Wh of energy is released. 14 Wh more energy is released in burning Hydrogen and Oxygen than is required to split water. This excess must be absorbed from the surrounding media(environment) in the form of heat during electolysis."

And then, "At 25 degrees celcius, for voltages of 1.23 to 1.47 V, the electrolysis reaction ABSORBS HEAT. At over 1.47 V at 25 degrees celcius, the reaction gives off heat."

For german reading people we recommend the book of Bockris/Justi "Wasserstoff - Energie für alle Zeiten" (Priemer 1980), p. 242 f. "Thermodynamik der Wasserzersetzung". There are also references to the "endotherm" window with additonal energy flowing in from the surrounding heat.

Another reference is given in th US-patent No. 4,394,230, July 19, 1983, from inventor Henry K. Puharich. See:


Puharich mentioned a statement S.S. Penner and L. Iverman, taken from the book "Energy", Vol. II, Non-Nuclear Energy Technologies, Addison-Wesley Publ. Company, Inc. Rev,. Edition, 1977. p. 140 ff:
"It should be possible to improve the efficiency achieved in practical electrolysis to about 100% because, under optimal operative conditions, the theoretically-attainable energy conversion by electrolysis is about 120% of the electrical energy input." ... "When H2 (gas) and O (gas) are generated by electrolysis, the electrolysis cell must absorb heat from the surroundings, in order to remain at constant temperature. It is this ability to produce gaseous electrolysis that is ultimately responsible for energy-conversion efficiencies during electrolysis greater than unity."

Puharich has realized that the water molecule can be energized by electrical means so as to shift the bond from the 104 deg. configuration to the 109 deg. 28 sec. tetrahedral geometrical configuration. An electrical function generator is used to produce complex electrical wave form frequencies which are applied to, and match the complex resonant frequencies of the tetrahedral geometrical form of water. Puharich has found a resonant frequency of 600 Hz (+/- 5 Hz) when he used 4 Volt rms and 25 mA (100 mW) or 2.6 V and 38 mA (98.8 mW).

Additional informations concerning "water splitting" via pulsed input energy can be found under:


While Puharich radiated water with 600Hz (the optimal frequency depends on the power levels with load) - Keely used 510 Hz, 620 Hz and 12'000 Hz.

Remark: The higher resonance frequency of 923 Hz used in the reference http://buerger.metropolis.de/drax22/

could be caused by the addition of 0.1 parts sulfurized acid to the water (in order to encance the conductance)

Further references are:

Deutsche Offenlegungsschrift 2416993, 9.10.75, Karl Heinz Hartkorn

Gleichstrom-Elektrolyse mit überlagertem Wechselfeld, 300 V, HF, 10-höhere Ausbaute im Vergleich zur Normalelektrolyse (10 times higher efficiency compared to standard electrolysis)

Deutsche Offenlegungsschrift 4'025'803 A1, Joachim Scheuermann (15.8.1990).

Wassermoleküle werden zum Schwingen angeregt durch Bestrahlung mit der Eigenfrequenz des Wassers. US 5,257,598, Fred Mehr

Verfahren für Fuel and Water Vaporizer

More informations about "Water-motor" is published in NET-Journal Vol. 4, No.4/5, 1999, pp. 24-28 (in german).

To remember:

Eagle-Research has launched a free NEWSLETTER covering subjects like 'running vehicles on water'. They have recently published a book 'Water as Fuel, Book 1'. 'Water as Fuel, Book 1' is designed as a 'research assistant' for anyone who wants to learn about the various ways that water has been and is BEING used as a fuel for internal combustion engines. They are doing their best to publish information that has been kept SECRET, in some cases for over 100 years. As you can imagine, anyone who has been making money selling fossil-fuel would not be particularly happy to see this information in your hands, so get it NOW!! The regular retail price is $22 and full postage charges apply. You can email, FAX or post your postal mailing address and credit card
information to:

order_room@eagle-research.com FAX: 250-428-8794 Eagle-Research, PO BOX 118, Porthill, Idaho, 83853 or you can place your order on our website order form (has secure
option) at:

Best wishes

Adolf Schneider



Energy density of hydrogen compared with gasoline, see:

http://www.unifr.ch/spc/UF/92novembre/schlapbach.html (in german)

Der (untere) Heizwert von Wasserstoff beträgt 120 kJ/g, derjenige von Benzin nur 44.5 kJ/g. (Factor: 2.7:1)


.... Liquid hydrogen is light, but due to its low energy density occupies three times as much volume as gasoline...

Calculation of energy density ratio between hydrogen and gasoline (see also http://www.f23.parsimony.net/forum46848/messages/75.htm Molare mass of H2O equals 18 g/mol (18 = 2 + 16) - therefore 1 litre H2O equals 55 mol. 55 mol gasous H2O occupy a volume of 1233 litre (22.4145 litre/mol) Only 2 mol of the 18 mol are H2 or 1/9 of 55 mol = 6.11 mol or 137 litre. Conclusion: From 1 litre H2O you will get 137 litre hydrogen (besides the oxygen)

Energy density of hydrogen is: 10.8 megajoule/m3 or 1.4796 megajoule per 137 litre (produced from 1 litre H2O) Energy density of gasoline is: 44 megajoule/litre. Ratio between energy density of gasoline and hydrogen (produced from 1 litre H2O) is: 44/1.4796 = 29.7

Comparison of reference http://buerger.metropolis.de/drax22/ with Daniel Dingles car:

"Buerger" needs theoretically (see my calculations on top of the email) 300 litre water to bridge 100 km (compared with a 10 l gasoline/100 km)

Dingle needs 4 litre water for a distance of 500 km or 0.8 litre water to bridge 100 km

"Buerger" needs 4.8 V * 0.3 A = 1.44 Watt and in order to split the 300 litre water a total electrical energy of 6 h * 1.44 Watt = 8.64 Watthours

Dingle needs 12 V * 3 A = 36 Watt and with 200 km/h to bridge the 100 km in 0.5 hours he needs a total electrical energy of 18 Watthours

So evidently the expended electrical energies are comparable. But - assuming that a big part of the produced energy is transfered from the environment via an engogenous process - it is not understandable why Dingle needs only so small quantities of water. Even if his machine uses the fuel in a more efficient way he should have a higher water consumption - if his machine uses hydrogen as fuel in a traditional way. It seems that some kind of additional energy is coming in which we do not understand


© 2000, 2007 PM.